1959 AC Aceca vs. 2011 BMW X5
To start off, 2011 BMW X5 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW X5 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 BMW X5 weights approximately 1360 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 2011 BMW X5 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Aceca | X5 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4857 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1933 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1776 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2934 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |