1959 AC Aceca vs. 2011 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2011 GMC Sierra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 GMC Sierra (315 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1421 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Aceca | 2011 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | AC | GMC |
| Model | Aceca | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 315 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2311 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5847 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2032 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3645 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 98 L |
