1959 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Audi Q7
To start off, 2012 Audi Q7 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,394 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi Q7 (493 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 419 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca.
Because 2012 Audi Q7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 2012 Audi Q7 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | Q7 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5088 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1737 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3002 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |