1959 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Chevrolet Sonic
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic (138 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca.
Because 1959 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 2012 Chevrolet Sonic | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Sonic |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 46 L |