1959 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Chrysler 200

To start off, 2012 Chrysler 200 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chrysler 200 (280 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chrysler 200 weights approximately 924 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1959 AC Aceca 2012 Chrysler 200
Make AC Chrysler
Model Aceca 200
Year Released 1959 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 280 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 890 kg 1814 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4948 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1394 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2766 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 64 L