1959 AC Aceca vs. 2013 BMW X6 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X6 M is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X6 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X6 M (547 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 473 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 M should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X6 M weights approximately 1525 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW X6 M is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 M will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Aceca | 2013 BMW X6 M | |
| Make | AC | BMW |
| Model | Aceca | X6 M |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 547 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2415 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4876 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2195 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |
