1959 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford F-150 (405 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1839 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Aceca | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Aceca | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 405 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2729 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5603 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2464 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1994 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3378 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 98 L |
