1959 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 375 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca.
Because 1959 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | AC | Mini |
Model | Aceca | Cooper |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |