1959 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Aceca | XC90 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2857 mm |