1959 AC Greyhound vs. 1952 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1959 AC Greyhound is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Greyhound (104 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1952 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph TR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Greyhound weights approximately 228 kg more than 1952 Triumph TR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 AC Greyhound (175 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph TR2. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1959 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph TR2.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 1952 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | AC | Triumph |
Model | Greyhound | TR2 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 56 L |