1959 AC Greyhound vs. 1965 Bristol 408
To start off, 1965 Bristol 408 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 408 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Bristol 408 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Greyhound | 1965 Bristol 408 | |
| Make | AC | Bristol |
| Model | Greyhound | 408 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 5130 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 98.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 81 L |
