1959 AC Greyhound vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 1976 Zastava 132 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Zastava 132 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 AC Greyhound (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
Make | AC | Zastava |
Model | Greyhound | 132 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2560 mm |