1959 AC Greyhound vs. 1980 Austin Allegro
To start off, 1980 Austin Allegro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Greyhound (104 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Greyhound weights approximately 278 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 AC Greyhound (175 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1959 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Greyhound | 1980 Austin Allegro | |
| Make | AC | Austin |
| Model | Greyhound | Allegro |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2216 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 48 L |
