1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 BMW Z3
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2000 BMW Z3 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Greyhound | Z3 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 74.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 51 L |