1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Greyhound (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 235 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Puma |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 83.5 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 42 L |