1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Greyhound (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Greyhound weights approximately 40 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Greyhound | 2002 Renault Clio | |
| Make | AC | Renault |
| Model | Greyhound | Clio |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 70 mm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |
