1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2002 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2002 Samsung SM3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Greyhound (104 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 67 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 AC Greyhound (175 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1959 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2002 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | AC | Samsung |
Model | Greyhound | SM3 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |