1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Greyhound (168 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Greyhound weights approximately 65 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Greyhound | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | AC | MCC |
| Model | Greyhound | Smart |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 84.8 mm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 47 L |
