1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Greyhound (104 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Greyhound weights approximately 273 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 AC Greyhound (175 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1959 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | AC | MCC |
Model | Greyhound | Smart |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2370 mm |