1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Greyhound (104 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (103 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Greyhound weights approximately 25 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 AC Greyhound (175 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (145 Nm). This means 1959 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2004 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Aveo |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 1606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 145 Nm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 42 L |