1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 480 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Mustang |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 84.4 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |