1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1207 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Greyhound | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Greyhound | TrailBlazer |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 4162 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 102 mm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 2247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 95 L |
