1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 1396 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Greyhound | 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | |
| Make | AC | Lincoln |
| Model | Greyhound | Mark LT |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 5406 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 105.9 mm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 2436 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 114 L |
