1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Greyhound | ML |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 92.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 2185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 95 L |