1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 SSC Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Aero is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 958 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (104 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SSC Aero weights approximately 200 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 1182 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 AC Greyhound. (175 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2010 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2010 SSC Aero | |
Make | AC | SSC |
Model | Greyhound | Aero |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 1062 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 1357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 1293 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1090 mm |