1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz E (518 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 350 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 812 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2012 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Greyhound | E |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 518 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4887 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1443 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |