1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (104 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (616 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 AC Greyhound. (175 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Greyhound | ML |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 616 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 93 L |