1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (104 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Greyhound weights approximately 13 kg more than 2012 Toyota Tundra.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 AC Greyhound. (175 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Greyhound | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Greyhound | Tundra |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 424 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 100 L |