1959 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1959 AC Greyhound. (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1521 kg more than 1959 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Greyhound | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Greyhound | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 102 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 2561 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 100 L |
