1959 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2013 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 968 kg more than 1959 Alfa Romeo Spider.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Traverse is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Alfa Romeo Spider. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2013 Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Spider | Traverse |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 277 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5173 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1991 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1846 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 83 L |
