1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1959 Alpine A 106 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,220 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Alpine | Simca |
Model | A 106 | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 1959 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2250 mm |