1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1960 Austin A 90
To start off, 1960 Austin A 90 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Austin A 90 (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 1960 Austin A 90 | |
Make | Alpine | Austin |
Model | A 106 | A 90 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 72 L |