1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 1962 Mini MK I is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Mini MK I is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 1962 Mini MK I | |
Make | Alpine | Mini |
Model | A 106 | MK I |
Year Released | 1959 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1360 mm |