1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1963 Mini MK I
To start off, 1963 Mini MK I is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Mini MK I is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Mini MK I weights approximately 85 kg more than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Mini MK I (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1963 Mini MK I will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 1963 Mini MK I | |
Make | Alpine | Mini |
Model | A 106 | MK I |
Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 530 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2040 mm |