1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1475 kg more than 1959 Alpine A 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Alpine A 106 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A 106 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 555 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 75 L |
