1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1982 Audi 80
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 80 (179 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1982 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 1982 Audi 80 | |
Make | Alpine | Audi |
Model | A 106 | 80 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 54.5 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 86.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 530 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 60 L |