1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 390 kg more than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Alpine | Fiat |
Model | A 106 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1959 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 54.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 71.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 530 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 57 L |