1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1983 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1983 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volkswagen Polo (39 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 1983 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Alpine | Volkswagen |
Model | A 106 | Polo |
Year Released | 1959 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 39 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 55 L |