1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Alpine A 106 | 1998 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 106 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 904 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2210 mm |
