1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,996 cc, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Peugeot Tulip has automatic transmission and 1959 Alpine A 106 has manual transmission. 1959 Alpine A 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Peugeot Tulip will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
Make | Alpine | Peugeot |
Model | A 106 | Tulip |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 45 L |