1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Plymouth Prowler has automatic transmission and 1959 Alpine A 106 has manual transmission. 1959 Alpine A 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Plymouth Prowler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
Make | Alpine | Plymouth |
Model | A 106 | Prowler |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2880 mm |