1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2003 Skoda Octavia

To start off, 2003 Skoda Octavia is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 820 kg more than 1959 Alpine A 106.

Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Skoda Octavia (172 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Alpine A 106 2003 Skoda Octavia
Make Alpine Skoda
Model A 106 Octavia
Year Released 1959 2003
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 747 cc 1983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 113 HP
Torque 45 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 54.5 mm 82.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 92.8 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 530 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 3700 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 28 L 55 L