1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 988 kg more than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Alpine A 106 | 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 106 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2770 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 54.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 102 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 530 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 74 L |
