1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2004 Ford Taurus

To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 1056 kg more than 1959 Alpine A 106.

Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (245 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Alpine A 106 2004 Ford Taurus
Make Alpine Ford
Model A 106 Taurus
Year Released 1959 2004
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 747 cc 2967 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 155 HP
Torque 45 Nm 245 Nm
Engine Bore Size 54.5 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 79 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 530 kg 1586 kg
Vehicle Length 3700 mm 5030 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2870 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 28 L 68 L