1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 801 kg more than 1959 Alpine A 106.

Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (310 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Alpine A 106 2004 Volkswagen Polo
Make Alpine Volkswagen
Model A 106 Polo
Year Released 1959 2004
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 747 cc 1896 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 138 HP
Torque 45 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 1900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 530 kg 1331 kg
Vehicle Length 3700 mm 3900 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 28 L 45 L