1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A 106 | 5 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 54.5 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 60 L |