1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 880 kg more than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alpine | Renault |
Model | A 106 | Clio |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 54.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 530 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 50 L |