1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,784 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A 106 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1784 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 45 L |