1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Alpine A 106. (57 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Alpine A 106 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A 106 | 6 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 57 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 55 L |