1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Alpine A 106 | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 106 | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 904 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2760 mm |
